
How to study the tensor field and its frequency?
Share
Introduction
In previous articles, I have already written about tensor rings – those metal circles that many people believe emit (or focus) mysterious "torsion fields." Few in the scientific world treat them as "facts" in the strict sense, but in esoteric and dowsing circles, there is a belief that these subtle energies truly affect people, chakras, or the home environment.
Today, I’d like to take a closer look at the topic of measurement methods. Is it even possible to detect something whose existence has not been officially confirmed by modern physics? Well, there are people who try – some using pendulums or dowsing rods, others analyzing Kirlian photography, and still others, more fascinated by the “tech” side, resorting to oscilloscopes and broadband meters. In this article, we’ll explore how all of this works in practice, where rough methods end, and pure faith begins, and what science has to say about it (or rather – what it doesn’t say).
It’s worth keeping in mind that most of the approaches described here are not found in peer-reviewed scientific papers, and their results are often treated by skeptics as anecdotal or placebo effects. Nevertheless, if you are into holistic practices, spiritual development, or dowsing, you’ll likely find many intriguing aspects here.
Why is measuring tensor fields challenging?
Lack of a unified definition
From the perspective of universities and standard physics, the matter is clear: you won’t find a chapter on “tensor rings” in textbooks. In quantum physics, there’s a concept of torsion fields, but it doesn’t necessarily align with what esotericists and dowsers mean when they talk about “tensors” or “torsion fields.” The lack of consistency in terminology automatically makes a scientist look at this topic quite skeptically.
Subtlety of the phenomenon
Advocates of rings claim that such a field is something exceptionally subtle, difficult to detect with classical equipment based on electromagnetism. As a result, they say a standard meter is not enough because we’re dealing with a “non-physical” or “energetic” band of vibrations here. Naturally, this is another reason why the academic world – accustomed to specific, repeatable results – is skeptical.
Lack of standardization in tools and procedures
Even among dowsers, there is no full agreement on how such measurements should be carried out. One person grabs a pendulum, another uses a rod, and a third turns on some Kirlian camera. It’s hard to develop a consistent methodology and replicate the same results in different conditions. No wonder skeptics use this as an argument: “If everyone does it their own way, where’s the objectivity?”
Popular subjective and dowsing methods
Pendulum and dowsing rods
The good old dowsing approach. When I visited various esoteric fairs or talked to practitioners, someone always pulled out a pendulum or a rod and gave a demonstration of “energy testing.”
Pendulum: The principle is that you hold it above the tensor ring, either inside it or at the edge, and observe if it starts to spin, in which direction, and with what amplitude. Based on this, the dowser concludes whether the field is strong, weak, positive, or neutral.
Dowsing rods: Two rods (often made of wire) held in hands. If they spread apart when approaching the ring, it’s a sign that “something is radiating.” If they cross, it’s often interpreted as the field being intense. Of course, it all depends on the operator’s skills and – let’s be honest – their subjective sensitivity to stimuli.
From the perspective of hard scientific evidence, the results of these tests are difficult to verify because they rely on an individual’s sensitivity and personal “perception” of stimuli.
Dowsing scales and measurement tables
Someone might ask, “Okay, but how do you translate the pendulum’s movement into a number?” At this point, various scales, like the Bovis scale, come into play. A dowser places the pendulum over a printed table with values and "asks" the pendulum for a specific number. And supposedly, this way, you can estimate whether the ring’s field reaches 20,000 units, 50,000, or 100,000. Enthusiasts believe in this method, while critics point to the lack of objectivity and repeatability.
Attempts at objective measurements
Kirlian cameras and high-frequency photography
A while ago, there was a lot of talk about Kirlian photography – pictures showing corona discharges around objects in a high-voltage field. Esotericists claim this is how you can capture an aura, while classical physics argues it’s simply an effect of differences in electrical conductivity (humidity, dirt, sweat on the skin, etc.).
In the context of tensor rings: some people attempt to photograph them using the Kirlian method and compare the images – with and without the ring. Sometimes they observe specific glows, interpreting this as evidence of amplified energetic fields.
GDV (Gas Discharge Visualization)
An extension of the Kirlian concept, also known as Dr. Korotkov’s method. In short, it involves computer-recording the image of discharges around a fingertip to assess a person’s "energetic condition." Some researchers on the border of science and esotericism test whether holding a tensor ring shows any differences in these discharges. Official science states that this could be a psychological effect or changes in skin moisture. However, proponents believe that if GDV parameters “improve,” it’s proof the ring adds value.
Electromagnetic radiation analysis in a wideband spectrum
A more robust method involves using a broadband EM wave meter, placing the ring in a Faraday cage, and checking if anything changes in the readings. In most experiments, nothing significant appears. Skeptics see this as proof that tensor fields don’t exist in terms of electromagnetic detection. Enthusiasts argue that it’s a “non-physical” field and standard meters won’t pick it up.
Theory of Tensor Ring Frequencies
“Sacred Measures” and Specific Vibration Bands
You might have heard that the key to tensor rings lies in the length of the wire (the so-called cubit). According to Slim Spurling and other proponents, each cubit variant resonates with a specific frequency in megahertz:
- Standard Cubit: approximately 144 MHz
- Lost Cubit: around 177 MHz
- Royal Cubit: often cited as ~188 MHz
In theory, you just need to set a wave generator to 144 MHz and check whether the ring “resonates” with it. Unfortunately, in practice, few have confirmed this to the satisfaction of the scientific community.
Can these frequencies be measured with an oscilloscope?
Attempts have been made: an oscilloscope, a wave generator, an antenna, and a ring are used to search for a “peak” in the spectrum. The results are often unclear and easily disturbed by signals from the environment (radio stations, Wi-Fi, etc.). Moreover, there’s no standardized procedure, so every research group does it differently, making comparisons difficult.
Subjective Experimental Methods Beyond Dowsing
Applied Kinesiology Tests (Muscle Test)
This involves assessing muscle strength in a person holding or surrounded by a tensor ring. If the muscle weakens or strengthens, conclusions are drawn about the positive or negative influence of the object. Critics argue that it’s a matter of suggestion and placebo, but in many alternative clinics, this remains a standard practice for evaluating the "energy" of products.
Observation of Changes in Mood and Emotional State
A method of “seeing and feeling”: you use the tensor ring for some time, sleep with it, meditate, and note whether you feel better, less stressed, or find it easier to concentrate. For enthusiasts, this is enough as evidence. For science – not necessarily.
Academic Research on Tensor Fields
Limited Number of Publications
When it comes to peer-reviewed scientific journals with high Impact Factor ratings, there’s a shortage. The topic mostly appears in self-published materials by enthusiasts, books on dowsing, and on the internet.
Reasons for Skepticism in the Scientific Community
- Lack of repeatable results in controlled experiments
- Absence of a coherent theoretical model
- Placebo effect and autosuggestion as possible explanations
Potential Directions for Future Research
One can imagine a university team organizing a series of tests with control groups – giving one group “real” rings and another group “fake” ones. If the results differed significantly, it would be groundbreaking. The question remains: who would fund such research and for what purpose?
Controversies and Interpretational Caution
Overinterpretation of Results
Even if someone notices a deviation in pendulum readings or Kirlian photography, attributing this to an indisputable theory about tensor fields is quite bold. Science demands replicability, which is hard to achieve under strictly controlled conditions.
Placebo Effect and Autosuggestion
I often repeat this – the human psyche is powerful. If we believe that a ring supports us, we may indeed feel better. This doesn’t necessarily prove the existence of non-physical energies, but as some would say: “If it works, why complain?”
Commercialization of the Topic
When something becomes popular and promises “extraordinary properties,” sellers always emerge to profit from it. I’m not saying they’re always dishonest, but it’s worth being cautious, as prices can be absurdly high and the alleged “scientific evidence” – highly exaggerated.
Is It Possible to Investigate Tensor Field Frequencies on Your Own?
Home Experiments with Dowsing
If you feel like trying your hand at dowsing, all you need is a pendulum (or even a thread with a weight) and some peace:
- Find a distraction-free place.
- Calm your breathing and thoughts.
- Compare the pendulum’s movement without the ring and with the ring.
- Note what you observe.
Will this prove anything scientifically? No, but it might give you a personal sense of whether there’s something to it or not.
Experiments with Simple Electronic Equipment
Those with a technical inclination might use, for example, an SDR (Software Defined Radio) receiver and observe the spectrum around 144 MHz, 177 MHz, etc. You check for any “peaks” when you bring the ring closer or further away. Most often, such tests yield no sensational effects, but some note minor anomalies (which are usually difficult to distinguish from random radio interference).
Summary and Conclusions
Studying tensor fields and determining their “frequencies” remains a highly debated topic. Some see it as a real, tangible phenomenon, while others view it as a collection of subjective practices and autosuggestion. As a practitioner, I often encounter clients in jewelry who believe their rings genuinely have energetic power. I see that this belief can be positive for them – improving their mood, providing a sense of protection, or relieving stress.
From a scientific standpoint, there is no strong, repeatable confirmation. However, the world is full of things we don’t fully understand. For many, incorporating tensor rings into daily life proves beneficial, which is reason enough for them to use them.
My advice? Experiment cautiously. If you feel the ring benefits you, great. If you don’t notice any difference, perhaps it’s not the path for you. It’s important not to abandon rational thinking – you don’t need to immediately buy the most expensive rings on the market and believe they’ll solve all your life’s problems.
Final Message
- Be open but not naive: Sometimes it’s worth trying new concepts because the world can surprise us. But don’t take everything on faith.
- Experiment and take notes: Anyone can conduct simple experiments with a pendulum or by monitoring radio waves. Even if it’s not perfectly “scientific,” it might lead to interesting insights.
- Don’t replace medicine: Remember that if you have serious health problems, tensor rings are not a miracle remedy.
- Respect others’ perspectives: This topic stirs emotions – some are fascinated, others mock it. It’s worth having respectful discussions, as each side may bring something valuable.
Until we have solid academic research that definitively says “yes, this works” or “no, it’s a hoax,” we remain in the realm of intriguing speculation and personal experiences. Is that bad? Not necessarily – sometimes these areas between faith and unexplained phenomena add a touch of mystery to the world and motivate us to make small discoveries. And that’s part of life too: exploring, experiencing, and forming your own opinion.
Good luck with your research – and remember, regardless of the results, it’s worth staying grounded and maintaining a healthy dose of curiosity!